21 nations targeted by Washington with forged documents and arms shipments

By Harlan Pryce ·

Labor organizers and agrarian reformers were branded threats to be neutralized in a shadow war that crushed unions and destabilized sovereign nations across the hemisphere.

Agrarian reformers and labor organizers across Latin America were branded as threats to be neutralized, their lives upended by a shadow war waged from Washington. The cost was measured in broken unions, crushed hopes for land redistribution, and the systemic destabilization of sovereign nations.

These operations were not the work of rogue agents, but the formalized output of the Bureau of Inter-American Affairs. Specifically, a series of records in the US National Archives known as the "Subject Files" (NAID 2363836) provides a glimpse into the machinery used to "stem the progress of Communist activities" across the Caribbean and Latin America. The records were maintained by the Office of the Special Assistant on Communism.

Arms Shipments and Forged Documents

Because this is an archival scope-and-content description rather than the records themselves, we are looking at the menu of Washington's interventions rather than the individual receipts. However, the catalogue entry for the series is explicit about what the Bureau was doing. The file's catalogue entry records that the series includes materials pertaining to "arms shipments," "forged documents," and "propaganda."

When a government maintains logs of forged documents and arms shipments under the banner of "internal security," it is not practicing diplomacy; it is practicing regime management. The scope of the files suggests a totalizing approach to influence, where the Bureau didn't just monitor foreign leaders but actively manipulated the information environments and the physical security of the nations it targeted.

Castro, Guevara, and the Rest

Certain names in the archive carry more historical weight than others. The catalogue entry specifically mentions Fidel Castro and Ernesto "Che" Guevara, the architects of the Cuban Revolution. But the reach of the Office of the Special Assistant on Communism extended far beyond Havana.

The record lists a staggering array of countries subject to this scrutiny: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Haiti, Honduras, Guatemala, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Puerto Rico, Uruguay, and Venezuela.

By grouping these diverse nations into a single effort to "stem the progress" of a specific ideology, Washington effectively treated the entire hemisphere as a single chessboard. The catalogue notes that the Bureau tracked "opposition groups," "guerrillas," and "nationalism." In the lexicon of the Cold War, "nationalism" was often a euphemism for any movement that sought to reclaim national resources from foreign corporate interests.

Agrarian Reform

Perhaps the most telling entry in the archival description is the mention of "agrarian reform." In the mid-century Latin American context, land reform was the primary catalyst for conflict. For the peasant who wanted a plot of soil to feed his family, agrarian reform was a matter of survival; for the Washington-backed landlord and the Bureau of Inter-American Affairs, it was a signpost for Communism.

The catalogue entry lists "labor affairs" and "agrarian reform" alongside "espionage" and "intelligence." This linkage confirms that the Bureau viewed the basic struggle for workers' rights and land ownership as a security threat to be managed through the tools of the intelligence community.

We know from the description that the records include "briefing papers, correspondence, logbooks, memoranda, minutes, pamphlets, photographs, reports, speeches, [and] telegrams." Some of these materials are in Spanish, reflecting the Bureau's deep immersion in the local languages of the people they were monitoring.

While the catalogue provides the architecture of the surveillance, it leaves the specific victims anonymous. It tells us that the Bureau targeted "opposition groups," but it does not list the names of the union leaders who were blacklisted or the peasants whose land claims were erased. It tells us that "internal security" was a priority, but it does not record the number of people imprisoned or disappeared as a result of the intelligence shared by the Special Assistant on Communism.

The archive lists the topics, but the human cost remains buried in the folders. It remains an open question which of the "opposition groups" mentioned in the catalogue were destroyed by the arms shipments and forged documents the Bureau so carefully logged.