General Wiranto and the Secret "Friend" Who Watched East Timor Burn
By Desmond Okafor ·
While Bill Clinton publicly cut off military aid to Indonesia, a secret cable shows the U.S. played the "friend" to a general whose forces were razing East Timor to the ground.
The ground in East Timor was not just being cleared; it was being erased. Families were hunted, villages were incinerated, and the soil was soaked in the blood of those who dared to vote for independence, a slaughter coordinated by the very military sworn to maintain order.
What follows is an account based on a curated archival description of a September 9, 1999, telegram from the Secretary of State to the U.S. Embassy Canberra, rather than the original pages. This distance from the source only sharpens the edges of the betrayal. On that day, the world saw a President Bill Clinton standing at an international summit of Asian leaders, performing the role of the moral arbiter by officially suspending all military relations with and assistance to Indonesia. But while the cameras captured the public severance, a different, more intimate conversation was happening in the shadows.
"A Friend" on the Brink
As Clinton played the bad cop for the press, Admiral Dennis Blair—the commander of U.S. forces in the Pacific who would later serve as Director of National Intelligence—was playing the friend. Blair met with General Wiranto, who commanded the Indonesian Armed Forces during the nation's violent transition from authoritarian rule and later became the Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal, and Security Affairs.
The record is stark. U.S. officials had known for months that the TNI, the Indonesian National Armed Forces—an organization that had systematically coordinated and armed militias to destroy East Timor—was the architect of the razing. Yet, in his talking points, Blair did not lead with the atrocities or the evidence of war crimes. Instead, he described himself and the U.S. as "a friend" who wanted the Indonesian armed forces to play a "productive role" in the politics of their country.
This is the classic architecture of the diplomatic squeeze. Blair urged Wiranto to "pull back from the brink of disaster for his country," effectively telling the man overseeing the slaughter that the U.S. was his only lifeline. The record shows Blair pushed Wiranto to accept a multinational force in East Timor, offering a face-saving exit by noting that Indonesian forces would maintain control until the foreigners arrived. This was not a demand for justice for the dead; it was a negotiation for a managed exit.
Document imagery from nsarchive.gwu.edu From the files: nsarchive.gwu.edu
The Canberra Routing
The direction of the telegram itself reveals a hidden geography of intent. The Secretary of State did not send this cable to Jakarta; it was routed to the U.S. Embassy Canberra, the diplomatic mission in Australia's capital.
This connection is not a clerical coincidence. Australia was the primary regional driver for the multinational force that would eventually enter East Timor. By routing the details of Blair's pressure on Wiranto through Canberra, the U.S. was ensuring that the Australian military objectives were perfectly aligned with the American "friendship" strategy. The line between Blair's private assurances to Wiranto and the logistical planning in Australia suggests a coordinated effort to move the TNI out of the way without breaking the man at the top.
There is a profound irony in Blair’s positioning. He acted as the diplomatic bridge to the Indonesian military leadership at the exact moment the U.S. was executing a total military sanction. The sanctions were the shield, the public-facing proof of American indignation, while Blair was the sword, carving out a deal that preserved the status of the Indonesian generals.
Vast Responsibilities Elsewhere
Toward the end of the meeting, Blair pivoted from the role of the friend to that of the strategist. He told Wiranto that "the situation in East Timor is complicated and TNI has vast responsibilities elsewhere in the archipelago." He concluded with a plea: "I appeal to you to let the international community help Indonesia help itself."
This phrasing is a calculated mercy. By framing the TNI's role in the razing of East Timor as a "complication" and reminding Wiranto of his duties in other parts of the Indonesian archipelago, Blair was not just giving him an out—he was acknowledging the fragility of the Indonesian state. The pattern suggests that Blair was leveraging Wiranto's fear of domestic collapse. If the TNI were too bogged down in a losing battle for East Timor, they might be unable to suppress insurgencies or political instabilities elsewhere in the thousands of islands that make up Indonesia.
Blair wasn't asking Wiranto to stop the killing because it was wrong; he was asking him to stop because it was becoming a strategic liability for the Indonesian military's grip on the rest of the country. The human cost in East Timor was treated as a rounding error in a larger calculation of regional stability.
The Desk's Reading
If this file is shaped the way it looks, the sanctions imposed by the Clinton administration were never intended as a strategic objective. The desk's reading is that the suspension of military aid was a performative diplomatic gesture designed for the Asian summit—a prop to satisfy the international community—while the real policy was the managed transition of power handled by Admiral Blair. The simultaneous execution of total sanctions and the adoption of the "friend" persona is a textbook example of a quid pro quo. The redacted sections of this cable likely contain the specific promises made to Wiranto: the terms under which military aid would be restored once the multinational force had sanitized the situation in East Timor.
Furthermore, the pattern suggests a deliberate intelligence blind spot regarding Wiranto's actual power. The record treats Wiranto as the sole arbiter who could restrain the TNI militias. However, given the TNI's deep coordination of the razing, it is the desk's reading that the redacted portions of the cable contain a skeptical intelligence assessment. The U.S. likely knew that Wiranto might not have had the authority—or the will—to stop the militias, but they treated him as the decision-maker because that was the only way to negotiate a diplomatic exit. In the end, the victims in East Timor paid the price for a "friendship" that ensured the men who burned their villages remained in power.
Sources
- Telegram from Secretary of State to U.S. Embassy Canberra, "CINCPAC meeting with General Wiranto," September 9, 1999. — National Security Archive (GWU)
- Document PDF (Telegram from Secretary of State to U.S. Embassy Canberra, "CINCPAC meeting with General Wiranto," September 9, 1999.)
- Background: Wiranto — Wikipedia