Rudini and the May 14 Bid to Replace Suharto
By Harlan Pryce ·
A confidential telegram kept secret for years shows a retired general using reports of student riots to market himself to the US as a replacement for a fleeing president.
The streets of Jakarta in May 1998 were paved with the blood of students and the charred remains of shopping malls. For the people of Indonesia, the cost of ending a thirty-year dictatorship was paid in terror, smoke, and the visceral fear that the army would turn its guns on the crowds. While the city burned, the men in the rooms—the diplomats and the generals—were not discussing how to protect the students, but how to manage the vacuum they were creating.
This story is reconstructed from the archive's curated description of the telegram rather than the original pages. The record is a confidential message sent on May 14, 1998, from the US Embassy Jakarta—the mission located at Jalan Medan Merdeka Selatan, just south of the National Monument—to the State Department in Foggy Bottom.
The Cairo Flight
At the center of the record is the fragility of Suharto, the general who had ruled Indonesia from 1967 until 1998 through a combination of economic development and brutal systemic repression. By mid-May, the strongman was no longer a pillar of stability; he was a liability in transit. The record establishes that Suharto was returning from Cairo, the capital of Egypt, following the violence of May 12 and 13.
According to the record, Rudini—a retired military leader, former Minister of Home Affairs, and a known critic of the regime—believed that "President Suharto's safety could not be guaranteed" upon his arrival. This is the first irony of the file: the man who had spent decades ensuring that no one in Indonesia was safe from the state was suddenly a man whose own safety was a matter of diplomatic concern.
But Rudini was not merely offering a security assessment. The pattern suggests that the narrative regarding Suharto's physical safety was being used as a diplomatic catalyst to accelerate the president's removal. By framing the return from Cairo as a security risk, Rudini provided the US Embassy with a justification to stop protecting the status quo and start looking for an exit strategy. The safety of the dictator became the lever used to pry him from power.
Document imagery from nsarchive.gwu.edu From the files: nsarchive.gwu.edu
The 2002 Timeline
Rudini did not go to the US Embassy to save Suharto; he went to audition for his job. The record states that students and academics had already approached Rudini to "serve as a replacement for Suharto." He told the Americans that he was "ready to assume the role" and claimed he possessed the backing of both the student movements and major opposition figures.
Most telling is the precision of his ambition. Rudini did not propose a transitional government or a rapid return to elections; he "envisioned himself serving as President until 2002" (record).
If this file is shaped the way it looks, the US Embassy was treating Rudini not as a source of intelligence, but as a candidate being vetted for a managed transition. The report of a specific end-date—2002—is not the kind of detail a diplomat records unless they are weighing the viability of a specific political timeline. The US was not interested in a spontaneous democratic eruption; they were looking for a professional who could keep the lid on the pot while the transition was tidied up in the back room.
A Trade in Intelligence
To make himself indispensable to the Americans, Rudini brought more than just a resume; he brought tactical intelligence. He informed the Embassy that students were planning to march on Parliament—the legislative body of the state—on May 14, the very day the telegram was sent.
This connection is where the record earns its coldest irony. Rudini was simultaneously presenting himself as the champion of the students and the man who could tell the US Embassy exactly where those students would be and when they would arrive. He was trading the movements of the activists for diplomatic legitimacy.
The desk's reading is that Rudini was leveraging street-level intelligence to buy US backing. By providing the Embassy with a roadmap of the unrest, he signaled that he was the only figure capable of bridging the gap between the chaos of the streets and the stability of the state. He was selling the revolution to the people who were most afraid of its unpredictability.
The Silent Arbiters
There is a profound silence in this record. While the telegram discusses retired generals, student marches, and academic coalitions, it mentions no active-duty officers. For a country where the TNI—the Indonesian military—had been the actual spine of the state for three decades, the absence of active generals in a discussion about the presidency is a loud void.
The pattern suggests that the active military command remained the silent arbiter of this transition. No retired officer, regardless of how many students cheered for him or how many cables the US Embassy sent to Foggy Bottom, could realistically assume the presidency without the explicit consent of the generals currently holding the keys to the armories. Rudini’s bid for the presidency until 2002 was a gamble that US support could override the military's internal veto.
Furthermore, the desk's reading is that the "opposition" Rudini claimed to represent was a fragmented coalition of activists and academics who lacked the institutional power to actually install a leader. This fragmentation is precisely why they approached an establishment figure like Rudini. They had the numbers to burn the city, but they did not have the signatures to sign a decree. They were the engine of the change, but Rudini wanted to be the driver.
When we look at the gap between the blood on the streets of Jakarta and the sterile reporting of Telegram 002689, the pattern is clear. The US government was not witnessing a democratic awakening; they were shopping for a replacement. They were looking for a man who could speak the language of the opposition while maintaining the habits of the military.
If a full release of the Embassy's communications from May 1998 were to occur, the desk believes we would find that the "safety" of the fleeing president was never the priority. The priority was the installation of a successor who could ensure that the transition did not move too far toward actual popular consent. The students were used as the wrecking ball to clear the site, but the blueprint for the new building was being negotiated between a retired general and a foreign embassy. The people of Indonesia paid for the transition with their lives, only to have the terms of their liberation decided by men who viewed their desperation as a tactical asset.
Sources
- Telegram 002689 from US Embassy Jakarta to State Department, "MGIDO1: Key Former Minister Speaks of Soeharto's Ouster," Confidential — National Security Archive (GWU)
- Document PDF (Telegram 002689 from US Embassy Jakarta to State Department, "MGIDO1: Key Former Minister Speaks of Soeharto's Ouster," Confidential)
- Background: Antonio Starabba, Marchese di Rudinì — Wikipedia