Pinochet and the 11-Year Silence on the Letelier Murders
By Theo Marchetti ·
A 1987 memo marked SECRET/NODIS shows the CIA kept President Reagan in the dark about the dictator who bombed Washington, while the State Department scrambled to shift the liability.
Ronni Moffitt died in a shower of glass and steel on a Washington street, a casualty of a war she was not fighting. Beside her lay Orlando Letelier, a former Chilean Foreign Minister and Marxist diplomat who had fled the military junta only to find the junta's reach extended to the American capital.
Their deaths in 1976 were the result of a car bomb planted by DINA, the secret police of the Pinochet regime responsible for hunting dissidents across borders. The public record establishes that Augusto Pinochet, the military dictator who seized power in Chile's 1973 coup and presided over a regime of torture and execution, personally ordered the assassination. For over a decade, the American government navigated the fallout of a foreign head of state murdering people on U.S. soil.
I am reporting here from the archive's curated description of a single document—not the original pages themselves—which establishes the internal panic of the Reagan administration long after the smoke had cleared from the blast. This record is a "Proposed Memorandum to the President," dated October 8, 1987, and stamped SECRET/NODIS.
A Shower of Glass on Sheridan Circle
The document records a meeting between George Shultz, the Secretary of State who managed the administration's Cold War diplomatic pivots, and William Webster, the CIA Director who oversaw the agency's intelligence apparatus during the final Reagan years. The subject of their conversation was an agency assessment "implicating Pinochet as responsible for ordering the assassination of former Foreign Minister Letelier, which also resulted in the death of Ronni Moffitt," the record states.
Ronni Moffitt had been a researcher at the Institute for Policy Studies, a D.C. think tank focused on international peace. Her death was not an accident of proximity but a consequence of the Pinochet regime's willingness to treat Washington D.C. as a permissible combat zone. The record shows that by 1987, the CIA had the evidence to tie the order directly to the dictator. Yet, the most striking fact in the memo is not what the CIA knew, but who they had not told.
Document imagery from nsarchive.gwu.edu From the files: nsarchive.gwu.edu
The 11-Year Silence
The memorandum reveals that despite the CIA's clear assessment, William Webster had not briefed the President on the findings. This gap is where the story actually lives. In the world of intelligence, a failure to brief the commander-in-chief on the murder of a diplomat in the U.S. capital is not a clerical error; it is a policy.
Assistant Secretary for Latin America Elliott Abrams—who would later serve in the George W. Bush and Donald Trump administrations—and other State Department officials recommended that Shultz send a summary of the CIA assessment to President Reagan. The record is explicit: this recommendation existed specifically "since the CIA has not briefed him on its findings."
The connection here is a study in institutional friction. The CIA held the proof of a murder, but the State Department was the one pushing to put that proof on the President's desk. The public record shows that Pinochet had been a strategic asset for the U.S. in the fight against Marxism in South America. To acknowledge his role in a D.C. bombing was to acknowledge that the U.S. was sheltering a mass murderer in its diplomatic embrace.
The Proposed Liability
The status of this document as a "Proposed Memorandum" is a critical detail. It was not a final directive or a completed report; it was a draft, a piece of paper waiting for a signature to move it from the shadows of the State Department to the light of the Oval Office.
If this file is shaped the way it looks, the desk's reading is that the "proposed" status indicates the information was viewed as a liability to be managed or suppressed rather than a critical intelligence finding to be acted upon. The administration was not seeking justice for Moffitt or Letelier; it was calculating the cost of the truth.
Furthermore, the record shows that Shultz and Webster agreed that the CIA would brief Department of Justice officials on the intelligence. The pattern suggests the prioritization of the DOJ over the President was a tactical move. By funneling the intelligence into a legal channel first, the administration was seeking a legal "off-ramp" to distance itself from Pinochet without admitting that the executive branch had potentially ignored the evidence for years.
The Presidential Firewall
The eleven-year gap between the 1976 bombing and the 1987 effort to brief the President is an abyss. The intelligence implicating Pinochet did not suddenly appear in 1987; the CIA had been monitoring the regime's activities for years. The desk's reading is that the CIA's failure to brief the President on its own assessment indicates a strategic firewall designed to maintain the President's plausible deniability regarding the Pinochet regime.
By keeping the President in the dark, the CIA ensured that the White House could maintain a working relationship with Pinochet without the President ever having to sign a document that acknowledged the dictator as a murderer of Americans. It created a vacuum of knowledge that protected the politician at the expense of the record.
The push from Elliott Abrams to finally brief the President was likely not a pursuit of accountability. The pattern suggests this was a maneuver to shift the political liability of the Pinochet relationship from the State Department to the White House. If the relationship with Pinochet was beginning to sour as his strategic value declined in the late 80s, Abrams and his colleagues wanted the President to own the knowledge—and the risk—of that relationship.
The desk's reading is that this memo represents a belated attempt to create a formal paper trail only after Pinochet had ceased to be an indispensable tool of the Cold War. The administration waited until the dictator was no longer a necessary evil before they felt it was safe to tell the President he was a criminal.
In the end, the pattern reveals a government that treated the murder of a diplomat and a researcher as a ledger entry. The CIA provided the evidence, the State Department managed the flow, and the President remained insulated from the truth. The still-withheld pages of these files likely protect the exact moment the administration decided that the stability of a dictatorship was more valuable than the lives of Ronni Moffitt and Orlando Letelier. Those who paid for that stability did so in a shower of glass on a Washington street, and they remained betrayed by the silence of the men in the room for another eleven years.
Sources
- DOS, "Proposed Memorandum to the President: Pinochet and the Letelier-Moffitt Murders," SECRET/NODIS, October 8, 1987 — National Security Archive (GWU)
- Document PDF (DOS, "Proposed Memorandum to the President: Pinochet and the Letelier-Moffitt Murders," SECRET/NODIS, October 8, 1987)
- Background: Orlando Letelier — Wikipedia